Interview with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
July 2007
Interviewee: Jennifer Stoddart, Privacy
Commissioner of Canada
Subject: 29th International Conference of Data Protection
and Privacy Commissioners

29th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy
Commissioners
Nymity is proud to sponsor and exhibit at the 29th International
Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners.
September 25-28, 2007 in Montreal, Quebec
Register
Nymity: Before we begin, please clarify, is this conference
for Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners only?
Stoddart: The Conference is open to anyone
who is interested in privacy and data protection issues. Whether
you are an academic, an NGO, a privacy consultant, an ATIP
Coordinator, a business person, a regulator, a lawyer, a government
official or an IT specialist, this conference will provide
you with the information and tools you need to ensure your
privacy requirements are fulfilled.
Nymity: For private-sector Privacy Officers, what are the
major benefits of attending?
Stoddart: The conference will give Chief
Privacy Officers (CPOs) a better understanding of the environment
in which Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners work. It
will give them a window into their current and future preoccupations.
The conference will help CPOs better understand the privacy
issues they need to be thinking about, now and in the future.
It will help them identify and minimize the privacy risks
facing their organizations.
It presents a unique opportunity for CPOs to build relationships
with their colleagues, government officials and Data Protection
and Privacy Commissioners from different parts of the world.
Nymity: What are the main business drivers that led to the
topic selection for the conference?
Stoddart: We've worked hard to ensure that
the conference topics will appeal to a broad cross-section
of people who work in the field of privacy protection and
those who are eager to learn more about where it's headed
in the years to come.
Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners need to be responsive
to numerous challenges such as new information and communication
technologies, public safety and anti-terrorism measures and
the exponential growth of transborder data flows.
Terra Incognita is our chance to assess this shifting privacy
landscape and develop our responsive capacity to address emerging
issues challenging us as privacy professionals.
Nymity: What is the history of this conference? When was it
opened to the public?
Stoddart: This is the 29th conference. The
conference began in the 1970s when the first data protections
laws were being passed. The conference has grown in size and
scope over the years as more people have become interested
in privacy issues. It was opened to the public at the Paris
meeting in 1990.
Nymity: What is new for this year's conference?
Stoddart: This year’s Conference promises
to enrich the intellectual debate on the issues by providing
workbook materials as a starting point for most session topics.
The workbook materials are being developed for the whole spectrum
of issues: for relatively new privacy issues such as brain
scanning and also to bring fresh perspectives to more familiar
ones, such as privacy impact assessments.
The content of each workbook will vary depending on the focus
of the session, but all will include an introduction to the
session and some questions for debate. Most will include a
commissioned paper by a subject-matter expert. The workbooks
will also contain a variety of necessary resources, such as
important bibliographical materials, that will satisfy the
curiosity of participants who might be new to a particular
subject but also the more rigorous requirements of key policy
and decision-makers to locate trustworthy information about
the privacy implications of our conference topics.
We believe that this approach will encourage a greater exchange
of ideas among speakers and participants and open up opportunities
to move forward on the many challenges that we need to address
collectively.
Nymity: Why have the plenary sessions been identified as “dragons”
and the conference theme of Terra Incognita?
Stoddart: Our theme, Privacy Horizons: Terra
Incognita points to the challenge for privacy guardians entering
into uncharted territory, to anticipate and prepare to tackle
the "unknowns" in our field. We wanted evocative
imagery for this situation and thought the "dragons"
appropriately describe the six streams. The streams are as
follows:
- Public Safety,
- Globalization,
- Law Meets Technology,
- Ubiquitous Computing,
- The Next Generation and
- The Body as Data.
We will grapple with the challenges posed by these dragons
in more detail in some of the information and workshop sessions.
Other workshop sessions will be designated as “dragon
slayers” where techniques for dealing with the challenges
that confront data protection and privacy commissioners will
be explored.
Nymity: What does it mean to be accredited?
Stoddart: Accredited data protection authorities
are, by virtue of their broad functions and depth of experience,
the premier experts on the principles and practice of data
protection and privacy in their jurisdiction. They have the
clear mandate to promote and protect data protection and privacy
across a wide sphere of activity and all the necessary legal
powers to carry out the task. Four criteria must be met to
obtain accreditation:
- Legal basis - The data protection authority must be a
public body established on an appropriate legal basis.
- Autonomy and independence - The data protection authority
must be guaranteed an appropriate degree of autonomy and
independence to perform its functions.
- Consistency with international instruments - The law
under which the authority operates must be compatible with
the principal international instruments dealing with data
protection and privacy.
The principal international instruments are the OECD
Guidelines (1980), Council of Europe Convention No 108 (1981),
UN Guidelines (1990) the EU Directive (1995), and, as far
as they are relevant, the UN Principles relating to the
Status and Functioning of National Institutions for the
Protection and Promotion of Human Rights (1991).
- Appropriate functions - The authority must have an appropriate
range of functions with the legal powers necessary to perform
those functions.
Only accredited authorities may vote on any resolution presented
at an International DPAs Conference (although as far as possible
resolutions are adopted by consensus rather than through a
formal vote.) Only one vote may be cast on behalf of any country,
and the resolution is adopted by simple majority of the countries
present at a Conference. Where more than one delegate from
any country is present at a Conference, the vote is to be
cast by the national authority that must first consult the
sub-national authorities of this country, which in any case
have the option to make their positions known.
Nymity: Who is accredited? What about the USA?
Stoddart: See the list of accredited members
at: http://www.privacyconference2007.gc.ca/PRIVACY-190094-v1-Accredited_DPAs_as_of_January_2007-English.pdf.
The USA presently has no DPA or other organization which is
accredited. However, in past years, it has been customary
for representatives of US government departments/agencies
to attend the in camera meetings of international DPAs at
the Conference as observers.
Nymity: What is a sub-national?
Stoddart: A sub-national DPA is one of territorially
limited authority within a country, such as those found in
Canada’s provinces, Australia’s states, Germany’s
landers and Switzerland’s cantons. Gibraltar, Guernsey,
Hong Kong and the Isle of Man are also accredited sub-national
authorities. See the list of accredited members for more details
- “B. Authorities with a Limited Sub-National Territory.”
Nymity: What are the pre-conferences that will be held in
Canada?
Stoddart: As a lead up to Terra Incognita,
my colleagues from provincial jurisdictions are hosting three
Pre-Conferences which will enhance our program.
- Dr. Ann Cavoukian, Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner,
will host a conference on September 24, 2007 exploring personal
health information.
- Mr. David Loukidelis, British Columbia Information and
Privacy Commissioner, along with Mr. Frank Work, Alberta
Information and Privacy Commissioner, will host a two-day
conference on September 20 and 21, 2007 on private
sector privacy. (Note: Nymity is also a sponsor
and exhibitor)
- Mr. Jacques St-Laurent, Quebec’s President of the
Commission d’accès à l’information,
will host a conference on data protection in the context
of la Francophonie, on September 24, 2007.
Finally, a civil society privacy workshop titled "Privacy
Rights in a World under Surveillance" is being hosted
on September 25, 2007, by the International Civil Liberties
Monitoring Group (ICLMG). The OPC is providing the ICLMG with
$100,000 in funding and financial support through its Grants
and Contributions Program for the organization of this event.
Nymity: What are the social networking opportunities and who
will be attending?
Stoddart: There will be many occasions
for delegates to meet like-minded colleagues in both a formal
and informal settings. We have planned a delightful Soirée,
complete with spectacular entertainment, to be held at the
Chalet du Mont Royal as well as an informal dine-around evening
where delegates may choose from a variety of the best restaurants
in Montreal.
Nymity: What are the anticipated outcomes from this conference?
Stoddart: The purpose of the Conference is
to provide a forum to discuss key trends and issues related
to privacy. The primary goal is to push the discussion on
privacy rights and expectations further, challenging commonly-held
assumptions and spearheading innovative solutions to public
and private sector issues.
Nymity: What is your office's role for this conference?
Stoddart: I'm the host of this year's Conference.
As such, my office is responsible for planning, managing,
overseeing and executing all aspects of the Conference, from
the program, speakers and registration to accommodation, meals
and social events.
Nymity: In closing, what areas of the conference do you
find most interesting?
Stoddart: It's going to be a bit challenging
to pick a favorite session. Organizations may wish to consider
bringing enough representatives to ensure that they can be
part of as many sessions as possible. For example, they may
want to hear about location-based tracking but they may also
want to participate in discussions at the audit workshop,
which occurs at the same time.
|